Dissecting performance, not just reporting

I started with more questions than answers. That’s still true. Here, every day is a new investigation into attribution, causality, and what lies beneath the surface of reported outcomes. I push the team to test assumptions, re-examine familiar frameworks, and share real stories from the front lines.

Frameworks reimagined

Gain insight into attribution frameworks that go beyond face value, supporting deeper analysis.

Critical collaboration

Work with a group committed to questioning, not just following, prevailing attribution conventions.

Field-tested insight

Rely on practical experience drawn from complex, real-world portfolio scenarios.

The core team mapping attribution methods together
Annual increase +14.7%

Growth in advanced attribution projects

How we began

We believe performance review should be scrutinised, reworked, and made more honest by challenging established attribution methods from the ground up

200+

Projects with institutional clients

15

Specialists in advanced analysis

I’ll admit it: I never expected to be this obsessed with transparency. Yet here I am, mapping out every attribution method, pulling apart the logic behind each step. This team? Relentless. We believe every process is worth dissecting. Our goal is to provoke, not just inform, and help practitioners question their assumptions at every turn.

Key moments in our journey

2022

Launched our initiative with a single question scrawled on a whiteboard: What are we missing in current attribution practices? Gathered a small team of skeptics, each with experience in institutional portfolio review, determined to find better answers.

2023

Formally developed our stepwise attribution review framework, designed to provoke discussion rather than deliver neat conclusions. Early clients provided case studies that changed how we approached factor decomposition.

2025

Expanded our advisory network, collaborating with superannuation fund analysts and international researchers. Shared findings at industry events, raising new questions about the limits of existing attribution logic.

Meet the team challenging attribution norms

  1. 01

    Leads advanced attribution reviews

    Oliver Sutton, Lead Attribution Analyst

    Oliver Sutton, Lead Attribution Analyst

    I once wrote an entire wall of questions about attribution models. My background in institutional analysis and a decade of dissecting performance data means I never accept the obvious answer. I see every portfolio as a layered puzzle. My role is to guide clients through the messiness toward clarity.
  2. 02
    Data integrity and compliance lead
    Vivian Cheng, Data Quality Specialist

    Vivian Cheng, Data Quality Specialist

    Numbers can lie if you let them. I bring a forensic mindset to data validation, blending experience from audit and compliance with a stubborn refusal to take shortcuts. My approach: test, retest, and never settle for easy explanations. I mentor others to do the same.
  3. 03

    Implementation and workflow mentor

    Grant Morrison, Operations Advisor

    Grant Morrison, Operations Advisor

    I’ve spent years listening before speaking. My background spans operational reporting for super funds and coaching teams on implementation best practices. I know the practical pain points that surface in real attribution work, and I help bridge theory with daily workflow.

We use cookies to improve your site experience, analyse traffic, and support core functionality. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.